Wednesday, November 22, 2000
Carrey's 'Grinch' Steals Box Office Lead
By Dean Goodman LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Christmas arrived early at the North American weekend box office as Jim
Carrey's holiday-themed ''Grinch'' comedy opened at No. 1 and set several new records in the process.
According to studio estimates issued Sunday, ``Dr. Seuss' How The Grinch Stole Christmas'' grossed about $55.1 million for
the three days beginning Friday, the second-best opening of the year behind ``Mission: Impossible 2'' with $57.9 million. It
averaged $17,621 from 3,127 theaters.
``Grinch'' obliterated the competition. The animated comedy ''Rugrats in Paris: The Movie'' (Paramount) opened at No. 2 with
$23.0 million, while ``Charlie's Angels'' (Columbia) slipped to No. 3 with $13.7 million after two weekends at No. 1.
``Grinch'' marks new career bests for both Carrey and director Ron Howard, and the fifth-highest launch in history. If numbers
hold up when final data are released Monday, it will become the best ever non-sequel opening, replacing ``X-Men,'' which
opened to $54.5 million last July. ``Grinch'' is also the fifth consecutive No. 1 for Universal Pictures, a unit of Seagram Co. Ltd.
All this despite generally unfavorable reviews. Of 42 leading critics in New York, Los Angeles, Chicago and Washington D.C.,
surveyed by trade paper Daily Variety, 10 liked ``Grinch'' and 18 did not; the rest were mixed.
All but unrecognizable in heavy green makeup, Canadian funnyman Carrey plays the cave-dwelling curmudgeon originated in
Dr. Seuss' 1957 children's book and re-created in director Chuck Jones' animated 1966 Christmas TV special.
``The film delivers to all quadrants of the audience,'' said Nikki Rocco, Universal's president of distribution. ``It's an event film
and not just a holiday film. It appeals to everyone.''
Rocco said Carrey was ``extraordinarily happy'' with the opening figures, having suffered some disappointments recently with
``Me, Myself & Irene'' and ``Man on the Moon.'' His previous best opening was 1995's ``Batman Forever'' with $52.7 million.
Howard's previous best was the Mel Gibson kidnap thriller ''Ransom,'' which opened to $34.2 million in November 1996. The
director's Imagine Films banner, which he owns with Brian Grazer, produced ``Grinch.''
The all-time box office record of $64.8 million is held by 1999's ``Star Wars: Episode I -- The Phantom Menace,'' followed by
three other sequels, ``Mission: Impossible 2,'' ``Toy Story 2'' and ``The Lost World: Jurassic Park.''
Tracking firm Exhibitor Relations estimated the top 12 films grossed $148 million, up 53 percent from last weekend, and up 42
percent from the year-ago weekend when the James Bond thriller ``The World is Not Enough'' opened with $35.5 million.
``Grinch'' will face keen competition next Thanksgiving holiday weekend when the Walt Disney Co. pair of family comedy ''102
Dalmatians'' and superhero thriller ``Unbreakable'' open in theaters on Wednesday.
Although the critics were overwhelmingly enthusiastic -- only one grinch out of 24 reviews -- ``Rugrats in Paris'' opened with
$4 million less than 1998's forerunner, ``The Rugrats Movie.'' The new film averaged a strong $7,839 per theater.
Based on the hit Nickelodeon TV series, it follows the Parisian exploits of a gang of pre-schoolers headed by Tommy, Dill and
Angelica Pickles. The original ended up with $100 million domestically and about $40 million overseas.
After 17 days in release, ``Charlie's Angels'' has racked up $93.6 million in North America. The female crimefighter action-
comedy film opened in 27 countries this weekend and was No. 1 in Mexico, said a Columbia spokesman. Final numbers will
be released Monday.
New releases ``The 6th Day,'' a cloning thriller starring Arnold Schwarzenegger, and ``Bounce,'' a romantic drama pairing
tabloid faves Ben Affleck and Gwyneth Paltrow, rounded out the top five.
Columbia's ``6th Day'' earned $13.2 million, about $6 million less than Schwarzenegger's November 1999 release, ``End of
Days.''
``Bounce'' (Miramax), in which Affleck's duplicitous character courts the widow (Paltrow) of a plane crash victim, earned
about $10.5 million. They averaged $5,242 and $5,996, respectively. Critics gave ``Bounce'' the thumbs-down, and were only
slightly kinder to ``6th Day.''
Columbia Pictures is a unit of Sony Corp. Paramount Pictures is a unit of Viacom Inc. Miramax Films is a unit of Disney.
The top 10 movies at the box office
LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Following are the top 10 movies at the North
American box office for the Nov. 17-19 weekend, according to studio estimates collected Sunday by Reuters.
Final data will be issued Monday.
1 (+) The Grinch ... ............... $55,820,330
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $55,820,330
2 (+) Rugrats in Paris: The Movie .. $22,718,184
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $22,718,184
3 (1) Charlie's Angels ............. $13,361,646
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $93,258,819
4 (+) The 6th Day .................. $13,020,883
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $13,020,883
5 (+) Bounce ....................... $11,423,716
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $11,423,716
6 (3) Men of Honor ................. $7,906,419
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $24,918,784
7 (2) Little Nicky ................. $7,753,107
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $26,506,194
8 (4) Meet the Parents ............. $6,367,685
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $138,513,485
9 (5) Red Planet ................... $2,818,384
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: 13,516,530
10 (6) The Legend of Bagger Vance ... $2,817,983
BOX OFFICE SO FAR: $25,220,736
NOTE: Last weekend's position in parenthesis. ``+'' - new release.
``Dr. Seuss' How The Grinch Stole Christmas'' and ``Meet the Parents'' are released by Universal Pictures, a
unit of Seagram Co. Ltd..
``Rugrats in Paris: The Movie'' is released by Paramount Pictures, a unit of Viacom Inc..
``Charlie's Angels'' and ``The 6th Day'' are released by Columbia Pictures, a unit of Sony Corp..
``Bounce'' is released by Miramax Films, a unit of Walt Disney Co..
``Men of Honor'' is released by Twentieth Century Fox, a unit of Fox Entertainment Group Inc..
``Little Nicky'' is released by New Line Cinema, and ``Red Planet'' by Warner Bros., both units of Time
Warner Inc.
``The Legend of Bagger Vance'' is released by DreamWorks SKG, which is privately held. REUTERS
JOHN L.: A busy week at the box office. The question this week is did the Grinch make $55 million because of the book, the TV special, or Jim Carrey? I saw The Grinch this weekend and I have a full review. The Rugrats have returned to movie franchise land with their second movie in a year. Arnold S. is in serious trouble. He has not had a legit successful movie since True Lies over 6 years ago. Mr. Black Plowman is being nudged aside by newer action heroes like Russell Crowe and Hugh Jackman. And two ex-lovebirds reunite to cause each other more romantic pain. Much to goof on this week.
DR. SEUSS' HOW THE GRINCH STOLE CHRISTMAS - FULL REVIEW:
Jim Carrey is finally back in box office record form with his first mega hit
since Liar Liar in 1997. If this movie had failed to open well, then
it would have been pretty much over for the ex In Living Color co-star.
The story of the Grinch and how he ripped off the town of Whoville is probably
the 4th most popular Christmas story next to Rudolph, Scrooge, and Jesus.
More people are familiar with the holiday cartoon than the Theodore Geisel
picture book. I have read the story
and seen the special several times. I liked the story of how this green
goblin like creature living on a hill was disgusted with the overly nice and
friendly Whos of Whoville. Their constant singing and playing kept
interfering with his brooding. He wants them know his pain so he decides
to take awau all of their Christmas presents to ruin their
holiday. He succeeds, but to his surprise, the Whos are still
singing and smiling even without the material gifts to unwrap. The Grinch
was so shocked by this that he became a good person and learned the true meaning
of Christmas. Ahhh. Ever since I was 5 I have never been ever to
figure this story out. What pissed off the Grinch so much that he would
result to breaking and entering and why was it so easy for the Whos to deal with
the invasion of their homes? Christmas is about a lot of things, but at
least a good 40% of it is the exchanging and receiving of gifts. The Whos
must have been upset when they woke up but Geisel had to cut the story down a
few pages and the cartoon minus commercials was only about 23 1/2 minutes.
What the live action movie does is try to answer the main question of why.
Was the Grinch always mean? Are the Whos all nice. Is Cindy Lou too
idealistic? What really happened when the Whos found all of their presents
had been stolen? The movie attempts to answer these questions.
However, just doing that does not help make this movie some great artistic piece
of cinema. Let's look at what we get. Jim
Carrey
seems to be a natural if not the only actor who could come close to pulling off
a live action version of a cartoon. He has done it before with "The
Mask" and he channels that performance for much of the film. He also
rips off one of his more popular In Living Color characters, Fire Marshall
Bill. Carrey pretty much does his stand up routine and impersonates the
Grinch if he wore that ancient mask from the "The Mask." It
works, but it causes you not to think of the Grinch as a character and more of
just another Jim Carrey vehicle. He looks to be having fun doing the part
and is energetic enough, but anyone could have been in that costume since Carrey
is unrecognizable. The most impressive thing Carrey did was not even in
the film. Last year when it was announced he was going to play the "Mean
One" he came out without makeup and contorted his face into the shape of
the G-man. He looked more like the Grinch doing that than in the full
makeup. The actors playing the Whos are okay with probably the father of
Cindy Lou being my favorite. The problem with the Whos is the nose and lip
extension makeup. It is very creepy to look at these Whovians. They
reminded me of the doctors and nurses in that Twilight Zone episode, "Eye
of the Beholder" where the "normal" looking people all had these
pig faces and the ugly ones looked like what we would consider a
supermodel. I could deal with the makeup personally, but what annoyed me
was the excuses made for other Whos to not have the full nose and lip
appliance. Little kids had to wait to grow into their noses and I guess
some of the women had plastic surgery to get rid
of their defect. For example, Christine Baranski plays Martha May Who, a
potential love interest for the Grinch. For some reason, this fully grown
Who has no racially formed nose and mouth. Baranski is somewhat strange
looking in her normal look and it makes you think the makers of the movie
thought she looked so much like a Who already that no extensive makeup was
needed. Also, when movies about cartoons are made, they sometimes make the
sets too cartoony. So, buildings and camera angles are all crooked and it
becomes another frustrating thing to sit through. I did like the movie
overall because it did explain the nagging questions I have always had about the
story and that they show the Grinch as a little boy and that image was one of
the funniest things I have seen all year for some reason. This movie will
appeal to grade school kids and parents looking for something to kill
time. Older adults or the Gen Xers who grew up watching and reading the
story may not dig it. The movie has to extend a children's picture book
and half hour cartoon into an hour and 45 minute film which causes things to
drag from time to time. In fact the main story everyone is familiar with
does not even occur until the last half hour. There are problems with the
Grinch, but I found it enjoyable enough to recommend it marginally. Final
Review: 2 1/2 stars out of 5; 6 out of 10; C+; thumbs up.
I guess I am getting old. I do not know anything about the Rugrats
other than the names Angelica, Chuckie, and the catch phrase of diapee. I
watched the television show once when it first came on and thought the animation
was crude and the humor was stupid. Crude animation only works for me if
the writing is strong. I watch South Park and Beavis and Butthead and
there is no cruder animation than that but the writing was clever enough to
compensate for the poor drawings. Now, I do no begrudge anyone from liking
the Rugrat characters because I can understand their appeal of showing life from
the point of view of very little kids. Little kids have great imaginations
and go on wild adventures just playing with some blocks. Also, very little
kids are fascinated by bodily functions. Hmm, I think that appeal stays
with guys all their life though. The clips I have seen of the show and of
this movie look to be pretty entertaining, but I have commentary tracks to
listen to on my new DVDs so I don't have time to keep up with the latest
sustained kid craze. The last one I got into was the Mutant Ninja
Turtles. That was fun, but it was time to movie on to more sophisticated
fare... like South Park and Beavis and Butthead. The Rugrats movies seem
to be cash cows. The first 2 have opened very well considering the
competition and the fact that the name Disney is nowhere to be found in the
credits. Rugrat kids go to Paris, France and get into all sorts of
trouble. Simple enough plot and if it has a lot of pee and poopy jokes
thrown in, the more the merrier. This movie also attracts a lot of
celebrity voices who like watching the show with their own children. Susan
Sarandon shows up as Coco LaBouche who causes trouble for our heroes. John
Lithgow and Debbie Reynolds lend their vocal talents as well to keep things
moving. This movie looks pretty good, and I might have to give the show
another chance. I don't like being left out of the loop.
Arnold Schwarzenegger is one of the most well known actors in the history of
film. Even if you have never seen one of his movies, you know his name and
his look. For years he was on the first page of the Guinness Book of World
Records as the person with the perfect physique. He came over to America
and become a mega action star and practically re-defined the genre. The
Terminator films are considered cinematic classics. Arnold even married
into the most
powerful and influential family in America. His accent was so strong when
he first acted in Hercules Goes to New York that he was dubbed over like he was
speaking Japanese in a Godzilla movie. However, Arnold used that accent as
his trademark and it made him rich. His Austrian tone is as thick as ever,
but at least he enunciates better than he did in his Stay Hungry and The Villain
days. He even has his own catchphrase of "I'll be back" first
uttered in "The Terminator." His films have made over a billion
dollars worldwide, yet this week Mr. Schwarzenegger opened in "The Sixth
Day" to just over $13 million, his lowest since Jingle All the Way.
What happened? Why have people turned on Arnold Scwarzenegger movies.
Well, his last one, End of Days, which I liked personally, was hated by most
people who saw it. The previews of 6D were good but looked a lot like
other Arnold movies in the past few years like Eraser and End of Days that were
not as well received. Few people were willing to take the chance this
time. It did not help that promotional material said it was a cross
between Total Recall and True Lies. That just makes people rent or watch
their own copies of the original films. The other problem is that the
movie is trying to be topical with the clone storyline even though cloning is a
dead issue at the moment and no one cares. It is sort of how the internet
is the most popular thing to hit the planet since the invention of television,
but movies about the internet always bomb. Topical subjects work for TV
movies of the week, not theatrical films. Arnold is in trouble of becoming
Sylvester Stallone who no longer gets movie scripts on a regular basis since his
box office appeal has gone down to near zero due to trash like Judge Dredd.
Arnolds next movie, Collateral Damage sounds like one of his typical action
movies and unless it has some spectacular premise, it too is destined for the
$10 to $15 million opening weekend range. People seem to never have
forgiven him for the underrated Last Action Hero. I am a huge fan of
Arnolds and like almost anything he is in. My top three Arnold movies are:
1 - Commando; 2 - The Terminator; 3 - Conan the Barbarian. His worst
movies are 1 - Batman and Robin; 2 - Junior; 3 - Raw Deal. In fact, I
consider Commando the greatest action movie ever made and I am not afraid to
admit it. However, it is on my guilty pleasure list. Arnold
Schwarzenegger is a great entertainer, and I hope to see Sixth Day in the
theater before it leaves. I'm pulling for ya big guy.
There is a general rule of thumb when it comes to watching a romantic
movie. If the couple in the movie go together in real life or used to,
then avoid at all costs. Ben Affleck and Gwyneth Paltrow fall in love in
the new movie Bounce. These 2 used to date around the time Shakespeare in
Love was being filmed. Now they have to make goo goo eyes at each other
again in this movie with a very "I have
a cool premise for a story" plot. The story is that Affleck decides
to give up his seat on an airplane to another guy, and the plane crashes killing
the guy he gave the seat to. Oops. So, Ben finds out the guy was
married and decides to check up on the widow played by Blythe "Meet the
Parents" Danner's daughter. He starts to fall in love with her, but
he does not know how he will be able to tell her that he is the reason her
husband is dead. So, the whole movie you sit there waiting for the moment
when she will curse him out for lying to her all this time and he trying to
convince her that he wanted to tell her but could never find the right
moment. This type of plot plays a lot better on a daytime soap opera
than a theatrical movie. This movie opened better than I thought it would
but romantic dramas usually do okay if there is a big star or 2 involved.
However, the movie is all gimmick and in fact the previews barely mention the
driving force of the movie. Just looking at the trailer you would think it
is just another guy meets girl and falls in love while girl slowly realizes that
she has loved this guy from the moment they met. The marketing is afraid
to actually tell you what the movie is about. That rarely if ever
works. Affleck is looking to be as successful as his writing buddy, Matt,
and Paltrow seems to just go through these Hollywood guys one at a time.
She hung out with Matt Damon last year, Affleck this year, so next year I guess
it's time for a Rupert Everett star crossed romance. As for me, I am going
to bounce far away from any viewing of this film.
REST OF THE TOP 10 IN 10:
1. Next week, Charlie's Angels will have crossed the $100 million mark.
2. I can't wait for the Charlie's Angels video game where you can play death matches with the new and old angels.
3. Cameron and Lucy are attractive, but I still see Drew as a little girl setting fire to George C. Scott.
4. It is said that Bill Murray may not do the next movie, but I have to ask my self, what else does he have to do instead?
5. Even though Lucy Lui was very good in CA, I am still obligated by moral law to never watch the Ally McBeal show.
6. Men of Honor has yet to dive below the top 10 movies of the week.
7. Little Nicky is turning out to be a hell of a bomb at the box office.
8. Meet the Parents seems to be the sleeper hit of the Fall movie season.
9. The box office for Red Planet will definitely be in the red column.
10. Legend has it that movies about golf tend not to do well when taken too seriously.
HOLIDAY MOVIE PREVIEW
The holiday movie season kicks off this week with the debuts of 102 Dalmations and Unbreakable. I may check out the Unbreakable movie this week. Hard to predict what movie will break out this season as a huge hit. Tom Hanks has a lot to live up to when Castaway comes out next month. The preview shows way too much of the film. Dracula 2000 is Wes Craven trying to put life in the overused vampire genre of film. Meg Ryan and Russell Crowe fell in love on the set of Proof of Life, but will audiences love them? Nick Cage goes back to his Meg Ryan roots with Family Man and enters an alternate world where Tea Leoni is his wife even though he dumped her in his real world. Romantic heartbreak looks to be a definite for the Oscar winner. Kevin Costner is back taking on the Kennedys in 13 Days which may be the 1 millionth retelling of the Cuban Missile Crisis saga. For the kiddies and the 20 sided die rubes, we have Dungeons and Dragons with Thora Birch and Marlon Wayans (wtf?). Vertical Limit with Chris O'Donnell is supposed to be the best action movie of the season. I guess the makers of that movie never saw K2 or Cliffhanger. Mel Gibson figures out "What Women Want" and it may not be exactly what he thinks. Of all the movies coming out, there is only one I am actually looking forward to and that is "Dude, where's my car?" It has the funniest and best trailer of the year and I will be there first day to check it out. Don't be surprised if it opens to $15 to $20 million shocking all the box office pundits who think they know everything.
That is all for this week. Bye for now.
ABOUT JOHN L.'S KICKIN' BOX OFFICE REPORTS
THIS WEEK'S BOX OFFICE REPORT LAST WEEK'S BOX OFFICE REPORT
THE BEST AND WORST MOVIES OF 1999
EMAIL: